Connect with us

Opinion

Nigeria’s Brain Drain Conundrum: A Call To Action

Published

on

Spread the love

By David Osadolor

As we deal with the multiplex of our minds and call to heart the things that should be in the most definite ways, it is indeed beyond the questions of hope and endeavors. People are losing faith in the country and their attitudes are showing that. When an institution can no longer provide the basic things needed by its citizens, people lose faith. It is therefore okay in an absolute manner to understand that when dealing with our temperamental stars, habits, and attitudinal behavioral conducts would always hold the pillars of societal balance in relative terms. People are battered, tattered, and torn, both from dealings within their societal circles and the cycle of the national polity, and there is just no way to keep the magic light and lead the way if the habits formed from the system are not reformed to lead a successful life.
Beyond this, at the other side of this long table will be questions; aching hearts and searching eyes, and the solemn ideas of what exactly they are trying to be or where they can get to lead a better life.  Amid these pains are people; hearts, and heads, and the numbers are constantly increasing as more questions are popping up from the distant shadows like silhouettes coming to life face to face with the cold realities of the entirely aching nation with no one willing to pick up the pieces. So here are the biggest catches; beyond the questions are questioners – people who have come along with a cumulative experience, adversity from childhood or something picked at adulthood. Most times, these people are often with value-laden and hurt-laden struggles which have shaped their current habits and the necessities of letting go are not so visible. This is the system. This has nothing to do with motivation or willpower, but the loss of faith in the institution and the necessity to find a better place to live and thrive.
Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation and one of the continent’s largest economies, is often lauded for its abundant natural resources and rich cultural heritage. However, beneath this veneer lies a deeply troubling phenomenon – brain drain. The term “brain drain” refers to the emigration of highly skilled and educated individuals from one country to another in search of better opportunities. In Nigeria, this trend has reached alarming proportions, with thousands of professionals, particularly in the medical, academic, and technological sectors, leaving the country annually. This exodus has far-reaching consequences, not only for Nigeria’s economic development but also for its social stability and future growth prospects.
Let us remember therefore that in the past, our ancestors were forcibly taken to foreign lands in vast numbers, leaving behind only a few men, women, and children. This mass displacement, known as the trans-Atlantic slave trade, devastated our communities and stalled development, leaving our land barren. Many African scholars, such as Walter Rodney in his seminal work ‘How Europe Underdeveloped Africa’ (1972), argue that the slave trade significantly hindered the development of the continent, which was rich in both human and natural resources.
Unlike the forced migration of the past, this modern exodus is voluntary, driven by the search for better opportunities outside the shore of Nigeria. This migration manifests in two primary ways. First, there is the Brain Drain, where educated Nigerians leave the country to practice their skills elsewhere due to the lack of favourable conditions at home. Second, there is the broader migration of individuals seeking greener pastures, even when they may not have significant contributions to offer in their destination countries.

The lack of opportunities for many talented Nigerians has led to a significant diaspora across Europe and America. The country’s failure to provide an environment where its citizens can fully realise their potential has exacerbated the challenges of brain drain and migration, contributing to Nigeria’s ongoing development struggles. Our universities have suffered from poor government policies, leading to a decline in quality and prestige. Studying abroad, even in neighbouring countries like Ghana and Benin Republic, has become a status symbol. In the medical field, a significant number of Nigerian doctors and nurses now practice in the United Kingdom, while our political leaders, unable or unwilling to fix the healthcare system at home, seek medical treatment abroad.
As the country struggles to address its myriad challenges, the loss of its brightest minds creates a conundrum – a complex and persistent problem that seems almost impossible to solve.

The Root Causes of Brain Drain in Nigeria
One of the primary drivers of brain drain in Nigeria is the country’s deteriorating economic conditions. Despite being one of the largest oil producers in the world, Nigeria has been unable to translate its natural wealth into broad-based prosperity. High unemployment rates, inflation, and a volatile currency have created an environment where many professionals see no viable future for themselves and their families. For instance, a 2020 report by the World Bank indicated that nearly 40 per cent of Nigeria’s population lived below the poverty line, and this figure has likely worsened due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In such an environment, the allure of higher-paying jobs, better living conditions, and more stable economies abroad is irresistible.
A second major cause of brain drain is the inadequate state of infrastructure and public services in Nigeria. Healthcare, education, and power supply are critical sectors that have suffered from years of neglect, under-funding, and corruption. The healthcare sector, for example, is in a state of crisis, with many hospitals lacking basic equipment and supplies. This has prompted a mass exodus of medical professionals, particularly doctors and nurses, to countries where they can work in better conditions. According to the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA), as of 2021, about 10,000 Nigerian doctors were practicing in the United States alone, with thousands more in the United Kingdom, Canada, and other countries. The education sector is similarly beleaguered, with universities frequently shutting down due to strikes, poor funding, and inadequate facilities, driving academics to seek opportunities abroad.
A third factor contributing to brain drain is the pervasive insecurity in Nigeria. The country has been grappling with various forms of violence, including terrorism, banditry, and communal conflicts, for over a decade. The rise of Boko Haram in the northeast, the persistent clashes between herders and farmers in the middle belt, and the kidnappings for ransom that plague various parts of the country have made Nigeria an increasingly dangerous place to live and work. Many professionals, especially those with young families, feel compelled to leave the country for safer environments. The tragic abduction of over 270 schoolgirls in Chibok in 2014 and the regular reports of attacks on schools, churches, and villages, highlight the extent of the insecurity. In response, many Nigerians have sought asylum or emigrated to countries where they feel their safety is assured.
Lastly, the lack of good governance and political stability in Nigeria is a significant catalyst for brain drain. Corruption, nepotism, and a lack of accountability have eroded public trust in government institutions and stymied efforts to improve the country’s socio-economic conditions. The failure to hold credible elections, ensure the rule of law, and protect human rights has driven many Nigerians to seek a better life elsewhere. For example, the End SARS protests of 2020, which began as a call to end police brutality, quickly morphed into a broader movement against bad governance. The government’s heavy-handed response, including the infamous Lekki Toll Gate shooting, reinforced the perception that the Nigerian state is not only incapable of protecting its citizens but is also complicit in their suffering. This has further fueled the desire among many Nigerians, particularly the youth, to emigrate.

Consequences of Brain Drain on Nigeria’s Development
The mass exodus of skilled professionals from Nigeria has severe consequences for the country’s development. One of the most immediate and visible impacts is the decline in the quality of public services. In the healthcare sector, the departure of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals has left many hospitals understaffed and unable to provide adequate care to patients. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Nigeria has a doctor-to-patient ratio of 1:2,500, far below the recommended ratio of 1:600. This shortage has led to increased mortality rates, particularly for preventable and treatable conditions. Similarly, the loss of educators and researchers has diminished the quality of education in Nigeria, with many universities struggling to maintain academic standards. This has created a vicious cycle, as the decline in educational quality drives more students and academics to seek opportunities abroad, further exacerbating the brain drain.
Another consequence of brain drain is the loss of potential economic growth. Skilled professionals are critical to driving innovation, increasing productivity, and improving competitiveness in the global economy. When these individuals leave Nigeria, they take with them not only their skills and knowledge but also their potential to contribute to the country’s economic development. The technology sector, for example, has seen a significant outflow of talent, with many Nigerian tech entrepreneurs and engineers relocating to Silicon Valley, Europe, or Asia. This has deprived Nigeria of the opportunity to build a robust and dynamic technology industry that could create jobs, attract investment, and drive economic diversification. Instead, Nigeria remains heavily reliant on oil exports, which are subject to global price fluctuations and offer little in terms of sustainable development.
Brain drain also has significant social and cultural implications for Nigeria. The departure of educated and skilled individuals has created a vacuum in leadership and expertise within communities, weakening the social fabric and undermining efforts to address local challenges. For instance, in many rural areas, the absence of doctors and teachers has left entire communities without access to basic health care and education, perpetuating cycles of poverty and underdevelopment. Moreover, the loss of cultural and intellectual capital has led to a decline in the vibrancy of Nigeria’s cultural and academic institutions. Many Nigerian authors, artists, and intellectuals have relocated abroad, where they can find greater support and appreciation for their work. This has diminished Nigeria’s cultural influence on the global stage and reduced the diversity of voices contributing to the country’s national discourse.
Furthermore, brain drain exacerbates the inequality and social divisions that already plague Nigerian society. The professionals who emigrate are often those with the resources, connections, and education to do so, leaving behind a population that is increasingly divided along economic and social lines. This growing inequality fuels resentment and discontent, particularly among the youth, who see fewer opportunities for social mobility and personal advancement. The increasing gap between the “haves” who can afford to leave and the “have-nots” who are left behind, contributes to social tensions and undermines national unity. This division is further deepened by the remittances sent by those who have emigrated, which, while providing a vital source of income for many families, also create dependencies and distort local economies.

Real-Life Examples of Brain Drain and Its Impact

Several real-life examples illustrate the devastating impact of brain drain on Nigeria. One of the most poignant cases is that of the medical sector. In 2021, it was reported that over 80 per cent of the doctors who graduated from Nigerian medical schools in the last decade had left the country. This exodus has left many hospitals in Nigeria, particularly in rural areas, without enough qualified personnel to treat patients. The COVID-19 pandemic further exposed the vulnerabilities of Nigeria’s healthcare system, as the shortage of medical professionals hampered the country’s response to the crisis. In contrast, Nigerian doctors abroad have been making significant contributions to healthcare systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other countries, highlighting the loss to Nigeria’s own system.
In the academic sector, the story of Professor Olufunmilayo Olopade, a renowned Nigerian-born oncologist and geneticist, is a telling example. After completing her medical training in Nigeria, she moved to the United States, where she became a leading researcher in cancer genetics and personalized medicine. Her work has had a significant impact on the treatment of breast cancer, particularly in women of African descent. While her achievements are a source of pride for Nigeria, they also underscore the loss of talent that could have contributed to the development of medical research and education within the country.
The technology sector provides another striking example of brain drain. Iyinoluwa Aboyeji, a Nigerian entrepreneur, co-founded Andela, a company that trains software developers in Africa and connects them with global tech companies. Despite the success of Andela, Aboyeji eventually left Nigeria for Canada, citing the challenging business environment and the lack of support for entrepreneurs in Nigeria. His departure, along with that of many other tech innovators, highlights the obstacles that prevent Nigeria from fully capitalising on its talent pool.

Finally, the story of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, one of Nigeria’s most celebrated authors, reflects the cultural impact of brain drain. Although Adichie has gained international acclaim for her novels and essays, much of her work has been produced while living abroad. Her decision to leave Nigeria was driven in part by the limited opportunities for writers and intellectuals within the country. While she continues to engage with Nigerian issues through her writing, her physical absence from the country represents a loss of cultural and intellectual leadership that could have contributed to Nigeria’s literary and artistic development.

Potential Solutions and the Role of Policymakers
Addressing the issue of brain drain in Nigeria requires a multifaceted approach that tackles both the push and pull factors driving emigration. Policymakers must first focus on improving the economic conditions within the country. This involves creating an enabling environment for businesses, reducing unemployment, and ensuring that wages are competitive with those in other countries. Economic reforms should also include measures to stabilize the currency, control inflation, and attract foreign investment. By improving the economic prospects within Nigeria, the government can make staying in the country a more attractive option for professionals.
Investing in infrastructure and public services is another critical step. The government must prioritise the healthcare, education, and power sectors, ensuring that they are adequately funded and managed. This includes upgrading hospitals and schools, providing continuous training for professionals, and ensuring that essential services such as electricity and clean water are consistently available. By improving the quality of life in Nigeria, the government can reduce the incentive for skilled professionals to seek better conditions abroad.
Addressing insecurity is also paramount. The government must take decisive action to restore peace and stability in all parts of the country. This requires not only military interventions but also efforts to address the root causes of violence, such as poverty, inequality, and social exclusion. Additionally, the government should work to strengthen the rule of law, protect human rights, and ensure that all citizens feel safe and secure within the country. By creating a safer environment, the government can encourage professionals to stay in Nigeria rather than seeking refuge in other countries.
Finally, improving governance and political stability is essential to reversing brain drain. The government must demonstrate a commitment to transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. This includes holding credible elections, combating corruption, and ensuring that public officials are held accountable for their actions. By restoring public trust in government institutions, the government can create a sense of hope and confidence in the future of Nigeria, making it less likely that professionals will want to leave the country.

Conclusion
Nigeria’s brain drain crisis represents a formidable challenge, but it is not insurmountable. The country is blessed with an abundance of human talent, but unless it takes urgent action to address the factors driving emigration, it risks losing this valuable resource to other nations. The consequences of brain drain are already being felt across various sectors, from healthcare and education to technology and culture, and these impacts will only deepen if the trend is not reversed. Policymakers must recognise that addressing brain drain is not just about retaining talent; it is about creating a nation where professionals can thrive and contribute to the development of their country. It is about building a Nigeria that offers not just hope, but tangible opportunities for all its citizens.
The call to action is clear: Nigeria’s leaders must prioritize the welfare of their people by creating an environment that fosters growth, innovation, and security. They must invest in the country’s infrastructure, improve governance, and address the economic and social challenges that drive brain drain. By doing so, they can ensure that Nigeria’s best and brightest are not just celebrated abroad but are empowered to build a brighter future at home. The time for action is now; the future of Nigeria depends on it.

***Osadolor, the President,
Nigerian Young Professionals’ Forum (NYPF) writes from Abuja

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

The burden of Posterity: Why I pray for Aliko Dangote

Published

on

Spread the love

By Mary Laniyan

Once in a while, the universe gives us extraordinary human beings in different facets of life. They are not ordinary, and they do not fit in. They are outliers. They stand apart and do what only they can do. The one thing they have in common with the rest of us is that the paradoxical nature of humanity makes them imperfect as well.

In this article, I finally decided to write about a man whom I have admired and drawn inspiration from for decades now. Most great men are eulogized after their demise. How about we do more of it while they are still in our midst. How do I know this man? The name Dangote is a household name in Nigeria, and a lot more now beyond the shores of Nigeria, given his unending audacity to do what most only dream about. From Cement to Spaghetti, almost every household consumes products from the Dangote Group, who continually expands the boundaries of what is considered possible.

Aliko Dangote is not merely a businessman; he is a phenomenon of vision, persistence, and uncommon courage. In a continent where many entrepreneurs focus on trading imported goods, he dared to think differently. He chose to build, manufacture and invest billions where others saw only risk. The story of Aliko Dangote is not just about wealth; it is about scale. It is about the audacity to conceive projects that many nations themselves struggle to undertake. From cement plants that transformed the construction industry across Africa to the massive refinery project that has captured global attention, his journey has been a relentless pursuit of industrialization. An industrialized nation equals engaged minds and better security.

Yet, there is a burden that comes with such greatness, the burden of posterity. Great men often become symbols, and symbols carry expectations far heavier than flesh and blood can bear. The public sees the achievements, the headlines, the balance sheets, and the towering structures. What they rarely see are the sleepless nights, the setbacks, the criticisms, the betrayals, and the immense responsibility of carrying the hopes of millions.

For decades, Dangote has become, in many ways, a representation of African possibility. To young entrepreneurs, he is proof that global relevance can be built from African soil. To policymakers, he represents the importance of productive enterprise over consumption. To ordinary citizens, he embodies the belief that one individual can alter the economic trajectory of a nation. We often celebrate exceptional men, while forgetting that they remain human. We place them on pedestals and expect perfection. We forget that visionaries, despite their extraordinary accomplishments, still carry the limitations, vulnerabilities, and imperfections common to all mankind.

The recent conflict involving Iran and the United States brought the world face-to-face with a reality many people seldom think about. In fact, few, including myself knew about The Strait of Hormuz. It is a narrow stretch of water between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It is one of the most important economic arteries on earth. Nearly a fifth of the world’s oil trade normally passes through that corridor. When tensions escalated and shipping through the Strait became severely disrupted, oil prices surged across global markets, sending shockwaves through economies around the world.

Like millions of Nigerians, I watched the news with concern. Every report spoke of rising crude prices, supply disruptions, inflationary pressures, and the possibility of even higher fuel costs. Analysts warned that prolonged disruptions could push oil prices to levels not seen in years. Amidst the uncertainty, I found myself repeatedly saying, “Thank God for the Dangote Refinery,” not because Nigeria was completely insulated from the crisis. We were not. Higher global crude prices still affect transportation costs, food prices, electricity generation, and the general cost of living, but for the first time in a very long time, Nigeria was not standing entirely naked before a global energy storm.

There was a time when a disruption of this magnitude would have left us scrambling for imported fuel, battling shortages, queuing endlessly at filling stations, and watching pump prices spiral beyond the reach of ordinary citizens. We were an oil-producing nation that ironically depended heavily on foreign refineries to meet our domestic fuel needs. Today, the Dangote Refinery has begun to change that narrative. The journey is far from over, but for the first time, Nigeria can glimpse its own El Dorado, a future where its natural resources are not merely extracted, but transformed into prosperity at home.

As the Hormuz crisis unfolded, the existence of a world-scale refinery on Nigerian soil became more than a business achievement; it became a strategic national asset. It represented resilience, preparedness and the difference between vulnerability and capacity. Reports suggested that domestic refining capacity, anchored largely by the Dangote Refinery, was supplying the majority of Nigeria’s fuel requirements during the crisis. This is why great men often see what others cannot, while many saw an impossibly ambitious project, Dangote saw a future Nigeria that would need greater energy security. While critics counted the costs, he counted the consequences of inaction. While others focused on today’s profits, he invested in tomorrow’s stability.

Listening to the news during those difficult weeks, I was reminded that the true value of visionary projects is often revealed during moments of crisis. We celebrate factories when they are commissioned, but we appreciate them most when they shield us from storms. The beneficiaries of great vision are often generations who may never fully understand the sacrifices required to make that vision a reality. And so, each time I heard another report about disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, I quietly offered a prayer of gratitude, not only for Nigeria’s resilience, but for the man whose audacity helped make that resilience possible and less painful.

After all, we can’t begrudge a man who has been an entrepreneur since his youth, if he chooses to spend his twilight years on a yacht, sailing the world, he has certainly earned that right. Yet, rather than retreat into comfort, he continues to build, invest, and dream. More importantly, he appears intentional about continuity through succession, understanding that true greatness is not merely measured by what one creates, but by what endures long after one is gone.

With the passing of the IPP bill (Independent Power Producer), I am sure we already know what to expect. This is why I pray for him, care to join me!

Prayer for his health, because the weight he carries is enormous. Prayer for his wisdom, because the decisions he makes affect industries, communities, and livelihoods across Africa. Prayer for his strength, because pioneering paths are often lonely. Prayer for his legacy, that it may inspire generations long after the applause has faded. History teaches us that societies often appreciate their builders only after they are gone. Statues are erected when the voices they honour can no longer speak. Tributes flow when the recipients can no longer hear them. Perhaps we should learn to celebrate greatness while it is still amongst us.

Whether one agrees with all his business decisions or not, few can deny that Aliko Dangote has altered the economic landscape of Nigeria and Africa in ways that will be studied for generations.

His life reminds us that extraordinary ambition, when matched with discipline and persistence, can reshape nations. This burden is heavy, It is the price paid by those who dare to dream beyond themselves, and as Dangote continues to write his chapter in the story of Africa’s development, perhaps the most fitting response is not envy, criticism, or blind praise, but gratitude, reflection, and prayer.

As we celebrate men like Dangote, we must also turn the mirror toward ourselves. In our various spheres of influence, whether in business, public service, education, family, or community, what decisions are we making today that will outlive us and benefit generations yet unborn? Posterity is not the burden of great men alone. It should be a responsibility shared by all, who have the privilege of shaping lives, institutions, and ideology. One burden that cuts across, is security, “see something, say something”. A safe society is the foundation upon which all progress rests.

As I wrap up this article, it is instructive to remember the ones that came before Aliko Dangote, men and women who built the foundations of the Nigerian idea itself. Azikiwe inspired a generation to believe in self-determination. Awolowo envisioned a society transformed through education. Ahmadu Bello shaped the political consciousness of the North. Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti and Margaret Ekpo challenged the limitations placed on women. Achebe told Africa’s story to the world. They carried the burden of their era. Let us each carry our portion of the burden of our era with focus, purpose and intentionality, knowing that the future is built on the choices we make today.

Mary Laniyan

Systems Performance Coach

“My burden lies in humanizing workplaces, one system at a time”

Continue Reading

News

Unlocking the Kware Giant: A Blueprint for Sokoto’s Industrial Takeoff and Agrarian Wealth

Published

on

Spread the love

By Dr. Shamsuddeen Ahmad Aliyu (Haido)

​Agriculture remains the economic backbone of Sokoto State. According to recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the sector contributes roughly 42% of our state’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), with over 70% of our population actively engaged in farming. Yet, despite this massive demographic involvement, our agricultural potential remains largely uncommercialized. We remain primary producers of raw materials, while the immense wealth generated from processing and industrial optimization happens outside our borders.

​To shift this paradigm, we must look closely at our existing, underutilized industrial assets. The most prominent symbol of this untapped potential sits right in our backyard: The 250,000 Metric Tonne (MT) per annum Dangote Rice Mill in Kware.

​The Feedstock Dilemma: Why the Mill Sits Idle

​When the Dangote Group constructed its ultra-modern rice processing facility on a 27-hectare site in Runji Village, Kware Local Government Area, it was a data-driven investment. Designed to process 32 metric tonnes of paddy per hour, the mill possesses the capacity to process a quarter of a million metric tonnes of rice annually, making it one of the largest industrial food assets in West Africa.

​Yet, despite its completed infrastructure, the mill has faced challenges operating at full commercial capacity. The reason is not a lack of market demand for rice, but a structural fragmentation in the upstream supply chain.

​Industrial processing plants are capital-intensive and risk-averse; they require a continuous, predictable, and uniform pipeline of clean paddy. The current localized production model—characterized by fragmented smallholders, lack of access to certified seeds (like Faro 44/52), high post-harvest losses, and the absence of a structured corporate aggregator—means the mill faces a structural feedstock deficit.

​Resolving this deficit requires moving away from traditional, ad-hoc administrative interventions and implementing a sophisticated, business-to-government (B2G) structural framework.

​The Macroeconomic Impact: Keeping Wealth Inside Sokoto

​Activating a major asset like the Kware mill changes the economic landscape of the entire state. At current market rates, a metric tonne of high-quality industrial rice paddy sits at roughly ₦350,000 to ₦400,000. Delivering an initial baseline of 100,000 MT of paddy per year to the mill represents a direct capital injection of ₦35 Billion to ₦40 Billion moving into our state’s agricultural ecosystem annually.

​Because this model prioritizes direct institutional off-take from local farming clusters, this capital skips exploitative middlemen and flows straight into our rural economies. This injection accelerates the velocity of cash in our local markets, stimulating the retail, construction, and service sectors, and organically expanding the state’s Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) base without increasing the tax burden on citizens.

​Furthermore, industrial processing introduces a high-value secondary economy. The Kware mill generates thousands of tonnes of rice husks and rice bran as by-products. Rice husks serve as a valuable biomass fuel source for energy and manufacturing plants, while rice bran provides the primary raw materials needed to establish a commercial livestock and poultry feed-mill industry within the state.

What Full Operation Means for the Citizens of Sokoto

​At the microeconomic level, turning on the machinery at Kware creates immediate, sustainable livelihoods:

​Lifting 20,000+ Farming Households: To generate 100,000 MT of paddy systematically, we must organize and support at least 20,000 hectares of farmland. Under a structured, high-yield input framework, a local farmer cultivating two hectares can achieve a yield of 4 to 5 tonnes per hectare. This translates to an estimated ₦3.5 Million in gross seasonal revenue per household, structurally elevating thousands of rural families into commercial sustainability.

​The Logistics and Service Boom: Transporting 100 million kilograms of grain from field to factory requires an extensive logistical network. This translates into roughly 10,000 heavy-duty truck trips per year along our internal transport corridors. The ripple effect means immediate, year-round business for local transport unions, haulage companies, mechanics, fuel stations, and youth-led loading crews.

​The Blueprint for Immediate Takeoff

​To get the Dangote Rice Mill up and running, we must position our agricultural sector as an active, de-risked commercial partner. Look at recent sub-national agricultural playbooks in Nigeria, where major corporate off-take frameworks succeeded because the state acted as a credible institutional guarantor via a structured corporate vehicle.

​To achieve this in Sokoto, a precise four-part strategy must be deployed:

The Strategic Framework for Agricultural Takeoff

Establishment of a State-Backed Agribusiness Vehicle

Step 1

The state must incorporate Sokoto Foods Limited (SFL) as a public limited liability company under a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) framework. By holding a minority 25% equity stake and transferring controlling 51% operational ownership to a reputable private agribusiness managing partner, we eliminate civil-service bureaucracy. SFL will serve as the single corporate buffer to execute a long-term Paddy Supply Agreement directly with the Dangote Group.

Biometric Cooperative Mapping and Input Credit Loops

Step 2

SFL will biometric-map and cluster thousands of smallholder rice farmers into highly disciplined cooperatives. Instead of distributing open-ended subsidies, SFL will operate a closed-loop input provision system—supplying premium certified seeds, calibrated fertilizers, and mechanized ploughing services directly to farmers, with costs recovered strictly via paddy write-offs at the scale house during harvest.

Infrastructure Maximization and Dry-Season Irrigation

Step 3

Sokoto’s distinct edge lies in dry-season cultivation, which yields higher-grade paddy with lower moisture content. We must focus state capital on de-silting and expanding secondary canals at the Goronyo, Shagari, and Kware irrigation networks, paired with the mass deployment of solar-powered tubewells to farming clusters along our riverbanks.

Fiscal Incentives and Industrial Zone Declaration

Step 4

To completely lower the operational overhead of the facility, the 27-hectare Kware mill corridor should be designated as the Sokoto Agric-Industrial Revitalization Zone (SAREZ), granting a 5-year holiday on state-levied commercial taxes, accompanied by a dedicated, uninterrupted power evacuation corridor from the nearest electrical substation.

Conclusion

​Economic self-reliance is not achieved through seasonal government handouts; it is achieved by building the institutional scaffolding that allows our people to generate wealth through their own productivity. By transforming our state from a passive observer into a sophisticated commercial facilitator, we can turn a quiet industrial giant into the heartbeat of Nigeria’s rice production. The infrastructure is ready, our land is fertile, and our farmers are determined. With the right business acumen and structured policies, Sokoto is fully capable of driving an industrial takeoff that will rewrite our economic history.

​….Dr. Shamsuddeen Ahmad Aliyu (Haido) is the

NDC Gubernatorial candidate for Sokoto State

Continue Reading

News

Ojude Oba and the Silence of a Nation: Dancing While Oyo’s Children Remain in Captivity

Published

on

Spread the love

By Adinoyi Ukpa

As the horses trotted majestically through the streets of Ijebu-Ode and social media erupted in admiration of flowing agbadas, expensive beads, celebrity appearances and the splendour of the 2026 Ojude Oba Festival, a different Nigeria was unfolding far from the cameras.

In the forests of Oyo State, schoolchildren and teachers abducted by bandits remained in captivity, their families trapped in anguish, uncertainty and fear. While millions of Nigerians debated fashion statements and celebrated cultural pageantry, parents waited anxiously for news of children who had simply gone to school and never returned home.

The contrast was not merely ironic. It was an indictment.
It revealed a nation that appears increasingly comfortable celebrating itself while its children languish in the hands of criminals.
This is not an argument against Ojude Oba. Far from it.

The festival is one of Nigeria’s finest cultural exports. It represents history, identity, community and pride. It is a testament to the enduring strength of Yoruba culture and deserves its place among Africa’s great cultural celebrations.

But culture cannot become an escape from conscience.
What should trouble every Nigerian is not that Ojude Oba was celebrated. What should trouble us is that the kidnapping of schoolchildren no longer possesses the power to interrupt our celebrations.

We have become accustomed to horror. A nation that once recoiled in shock at the abduction of a handful of schoolchildren now treats such incidents as routine news items. We express outrage for a few days, issue statements, offer prayers, blame security agencies, and then move on to the next political controversy, celebrity event or cultural festival.

The children remain behind.
The parents continue to suffer. The kidnappers continue their business.
The country carries on as if nothing has happened.

The Oyo abduction should have triggered a national emergency. Reports from Oriire Local Government Area indicated that armed men attacked schools and communities, abducting pupils, teachers and residents. One teacher reportedly lost his life in captivity. Families have endured days and weeks of agony while awaiting the safe return of their loved ones.

Yet the incident never generated the level of sustained national outrage that similar kidnappings attracted in the past.
Perhaps that is because Nigeria has become desensitised. Perhaps we have seen too many kidnappings. Perhaps we have become too accustomed to headlines about bandits, terrorists and ransom demands. Or perhaps we simply no longer value human life as much as we claim.

The tragedy in Oyo inevitably invites comparisons with earlier school abductions that shook the nation.

In June 2021, armed bandits invaded Federal Government College, Birnin Yauri, in Kebbi State, within the Zuru Emirate. The attack sent shockwaves across Nigeria. Students and teachers were seized and marched into the forests.
The response was immediate and relentless.

The Federal Government mobilised security agencies. Intelligence operations were intensified. Meetings were held at the highest levels of government. Traditional rulers became involved. The issue dominated national discourse for months. Every release of students generated national headlines. Every development was closely monitored.

The process was long and frustrating, but one thing was unmistakable: the country refused to look away.

The victims remained at the centre of national attention until they regained their freedom.

The same pattern was evident in Niger State.

Whether in Kagara, Tegina, Pandogari, Papiri or other communities ravaged by bandit attacks, successive mass abductions provoked urgent responses from both state and federal authorities. Governors convened emergency meetings. Security deployments were increased. Community leaders were engaged. The media maintained pressure. Public attention remained focused on the fate of the victims.

No one could accuse the government of indifference, even where outcomes were delayed.

The nation understood that schoolchildren in captivity represented a direct challenge to the authority of the Nigerian state.

That understanding appears to be fading. Today, the kidnapping of students struggles to compete with entertainment, politics and social media trends. This is dangerous.

Banditry thrives not only because of weak security structures but also because of public fatigue. Criminals understand that outrage has become temporary. They understand that Nigerians have developed a short attention span. They understand that after a few days, another story will dominate the headlines.

This normalisation of insecurity is one of the greatest threats facing the country.

A society that becomes accustomed to kidnapping is a society that has begun surrendering its moral foundations.

The consequences extend beyond the immediate suffering of victims. Parents begin to fear sending children to school. Teachers become reluctant to accept postings to rural communities. Educational outcomes decline. Economic activities suffer. Communities become isolated. Trust in government erodes. Most importantly, citizens begin to lose faith in the state’s ability to perform its most fundamental responsibility: protecting lives.

There is another uncomfortable dimension to this conversation.

Nigeria’s political elite often appears more visible during celebrations than during tragedies.

Photographs from Ojude Oba featured politicians, government officials and influential figures eager to associate themselves with a prestigious cultural event. There is nothing wrong with attending such occasions. Public officials are citizens too. The problem arises when citizens perceive greater enthusiasm for festivals than for confronting national emergencies. Leadership is as much about symbolism as it is about policy.

At moments of national trauma, leaders must demonstrate urgency, empathy and focus. They must ensure that victims know they have not been forgotten. They must convince citizens that government machinery is fully engaged. Anything less creates the impression that public relations has become more important than public safety.

The lesson from Birnin Yauri, Kagara, Tegina and numerous other school abductions is clear: sustained public attention matters.

Governments respond more aggressively when citizens refuse to look away. Security agencies perform better when subjected to scrutiny.
Political leaders become more accountable when public pressure remains constant.

That is why Nigerians must resist the temptation to normalise the Oyo tragedy.
The kidnapped children and teachers deserve more than fleeting sympathy. They deserve national attention.
They deserve sustained advocacy. They deserve a government that treats their captivity as a matter of utmost urgency. And their families deserve to know that the country has not abandoned them.

Ojude Oba will come again next year. The horses will return. The colourful attire will return. The music, festivities and celebrations will return.
But for the parents waiting for news from Oyo State, every passing day feels like a lifetime.

Long after the photographs from Ijebu-Ode disappear from social media timelines, those families will still remember the nights spent praying for the safe return of their children.

That is why the real question confronting Nigeria is not whether Ojude Oba should be celebrated. It should.

The real question is why a nation facing an epidemic of school kidnappings appears increasingly capable of celebrating everything except the urgency of rescuing its children.

Until we answer that question honestly, every grand festival will carry an uncomfortable shadow. Because somewhere beyond the music, beyond the glamour, beyond the pageantry and prestige, frightened children are still waiting to come home.
And no nation should be comfortable dancing while that remains true.

***Ukpa a public affairs analyst writes from Okene, Kogi State.

Continue Reading

Trending